바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

A Validation Study for a Short-form Functional Assessment Scale (FAS-S) for Persons with Psychiatric Disabilities

Abstract

This study aimed to develop and validate a short form Functional Assessment Scale for persons with psychiatric disabilities (FAS-S) and to explore the factor structure of the FAS-S. Participants in Study 1 were 640 persons with psychiatric disabilities (410 males and 230 females). Participants' mean age was 38.1 (SD = 9.47). Exploratory factor analysis produced eight factors: (1) hygiene/health care, (2) insight/help seeking, (3) problem solving, (4) conversation skills, (5) household management, (6) task performance, (7) problematic behavior, and (8) interpersonal relationships. Study II, to validate the FAS-S, enrolled 506 participants (306 males and 200 females), who had suffered from psychiatric disorders for a mean period of 11.92 years (SD = 8.13). Confirmatory factor analysis using 24 items resulted in favorable goodness of fit indices (Chi-square = 416.5, df = 236, p < .001, GFI=.930, AGFI=.910, NFI = .924, NNFI = .958, CFI = .964, RMSEA = .041). Secondary factor analysis results showed two secondary factors (factor 1: “activities of daily life [DAL]”; factor 2: social skills) had favorable goodness of fit indices (X2 = 506.0, df = 244,p < .001, GFI = .916, AGFI = .897, NFI =.910, NNFI=.945, CFI = .951, RMSEA = .048). In addition, we calculated concurrent validities between the FAS-S sub-scales and certain other scales. The results showed that the DAL subscale of the FAS-S had a significant negative correlation to the PANSS, while the social skills subscale score of the FAS-S had significantly higher positive correlations with recovery attitude, hope, quality of life, and social support than did the DAL subscale score. We discuss the implications of these results and applications of the FAS-S.

keywords
psychiatric disability, functional assessment, DAL, social skills, psychiatric disability, functional assessment, DAL, social skills, 정신장애, 기능평가척도, 일상생활기능, 사회적 기능, 지역사회정신보건

Reference

1.

국승희 (2001). 정신분열병 환자의 삶의 질 모델 개발. 전북대학교 박사학위논문.

2.

김성직, 한양순 (1997). 만성정신분열증의 사회적 기능과 인지적 변인 및 증상과의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 16(1), 27-40.

3.

김이영 (2006). 정신장애인의 재활동기와 재활성과에 관한 연구. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 25(3), 623-637.

4.

김철권, 서지민, 김상수, 조진석, 하준선, 김정옥, 변원탄 (1999). 정신분열병 환자에서의 한국어판 사회적응 척도의 개발: 신뢰도 및 타당도 연구. 신경정신의학, 38(6), 1351-1364.

5.

김형섭 (2001). 한국어판 사회적응 자기 평가 척도의 신뢰도 및 타당도 연구. 아주대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

6.

김혜선 (2005). 정신분열병 환자를 위한 한국판 사회적 기능 척도의 타당화 연구. 성신여자대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

7.

김희정 (1992). 퇴원한 정신질환자가 지각한 사회적 지지와 정신건강상태와의 관계. 이화여자대학교 석사학위논문.

8.

박상규 (1997). 정신분열병환자의 사회생활기술 평가. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 16(1), 13- 26.

9.

박지원 (1985). 사회적 지지척도 개발을 위한 일 연구. 연세대학교 박사학위논문.

10.

배정규 (2005). 정신장애인의 재기태도와 삶의 질: 척도개발과 모형검증을 중심으로. 계명대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.

11.

배정규, 손명자, 이종구(2009). 정신장애인 재기태도척도 개발. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 28(2), 605-627.

12.

손명자 (1996). 기능평가: 재활정신의학의 진단. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 15(1), 235-254.

13.

손명자, 박동건, 최영희, 이선희, 배정규(2001). 정신장애인 기능평가도구 개발연구. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 20(4), 731-749.

14.

손명자, 배정규 (2003). 정신분열병과 가족. 대구: 새미래심리건강연구소.

15.

이성규, 김상희 (2001). 정신장애인 지원서비스. 서울: 홍익재.

16.

황태연, 박애순, 김명식, 송진우, 여운태 (2000). 한국판 정신사회적 기능-증상 평가척도의 신뢰도와 타당도 연구. 용인정신의학보, 7(1), 49-60.

17.

Alexander, J. L., & Fuhrer, M. J. (1984). Functional assessment of individuals with physical impairments. In A. S. Halpern & M. J. Fuhrer (Eds.), Functional assessment in rehabilitation(pp.45-59). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

18.

Anthony, W. A. (1993). Recovery from mental illness: The guiding vision of the mental health service system in the 1990s. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 16(4), 11-23.

19.

Anthony, W. A., Cohen, M. R., & Farkas, M. D., & Gagne, C. (2002). Psychiatric rehabilitation (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Boston University, Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation.

20.

Bengtsson-Tops, A., & Hansson, L. (1999). Subjective quality of life in schizophrenic patients living in the community: Relationship to clinical and social characteristics. European Psychiatry, 14, 256-263.

21.

Brekke, J. S., & Long, J. (2000). Community -based psychosocial rehabilitation and perspective change in functional, clinical, and subjective experience variables in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 26(2), 667-680.

22.

Brolin, D. E. (1995). Life-centered career education: competency-bases approach. Teston, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children.

23.

Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation (1984). Annual report for the National Institute of Handicapped Research. Boston, MA: Boston University.

24.

Frey, W. D. (1984). Functional assessment in the '80s: A conceptual enigma, a technical challenge. In A. S. Halpern & M. J. Fuhrer (Eds.), Functional assessment in rehabilitation(pp. 11-43). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

25.

Kay, S. R., Fiszbein, A., & Opler, L. A. (1991). 양성 및 음성 증상척도 평가지침서[The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale(PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 13, 261-276]. (한국얀센 역). 서울: (주)한국얀센 메디칼부. (원전은 1987년에 출판).

26.

McKibbin, C. L., Brekke, J. S., Sires, D., Jeste, D. V., & Patterson, T. L. (2004). Direct assessment of functional abilities: relevance to persons with schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 72, 53-67.

27.

Perivoliotis, D. G. (2006). Self-reported and performance-based functioning in middle-aged older outpatients with schizophrenia. Unpublished doctorial dissertation. University of California, San Diego.

28.

Snyder, C. R., Harris, C., Anderson, J. R., Holleran, S. A., Irving, L. M., Sigmon, S. T., Yoshinobu, L., Gibb, J., Langelle, C., & Harney, P. (1991). The will and the ways: Development and validation of an individual-differences measure of hope. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(4), 570-585.

logo