바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Confirmatory Factor Analysis of The Korean Version Inventory of Interpersonal Problems Personality Disorder Scales: Examination of a Clinical Sample

Abstract

This study attempted to verify the factor structure of the Korean Version of Interpersonal Problems Personality Disorder Scales(K-IIP-PD) by applying a confirmatory factor analysis to psychiatric patients. To evaluate the goodness of fit of three alternative models taken from factor structures which had been previously reported. the confirmatory factor analysis was carried out on the K-IIP-PD with respect to a group of 239 patients. As a result, it was found that the model with five first-order intercorrelated factor was the best fit for the data. This result differed from previous US-based studies which had reported that a hierarchical model with 1 second-order factor and 5 first-order factors was the best fit. Unlike the US-based studies, potential factors representing character disorders were not found here: however it seems that the model will be useful in sorting character disorders in ‘Stage 1’, and its utility will be further developed in measuring the level of character disorders by modifying items in the future.

keywords
한국판 IIP-PD, 확인적 요인분석, IIP, 위계적 모형, K-IIP-PD, Confirmatory Factor Analysis, IIP, Hierarchical model

Reference

1.

김영환, 진유경, 조용래, 권정혜, 홍상황, 박은영 (2002). 한국형 대인관계문제검사의 타당화: KIIP-C와 KIIP-PD의 신뢰도와 타당도. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 21, 391-411

2.

김원표 (2006). Amos를 이용한 구조방정식 모델분석. 서울: 사회와 통계

3.

오현숙, Goth, K., & 민병배 (2008). 한국사회와 교육적 성취: 문화적 배경과 국가간 비교: 독일과 한국 청소년의 기질 및 성격 특성의 차이. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 14(1), 391-407

4.

홍세희 (2000). 구조방정식 모형의 적합도 지수 선정기준과 그 근거. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 19, 161-178.

5.

홍세희 (2001). 임상심리학 이론의 경험적 검증을 위한 최신 연구방법론: 구조 방정식 모형을 이용한 매개모형과 잠재평균모형의 분석. 2001년도 한국임상심리학회 워크샵 교재, 임상심리학회.

6.

American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

7.

Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structure. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.

8.

Bentler, P. M., & C. P. Chou (1987). “Practical Issues in Structural Modeling.” Sociological Methods and Reserach, 16, 78-117

9.

Bollen, K.A. and R. Stine. (1992). “Bootstrapping Goodness of Fit Measures in Structural Equation Models.” Sociological Methods and Research, 21, 205-29.

10.

Cudeck, R., & Henly, S. J. (1991). Model selection in covariance structures analysis and the “problem” of sample size: A clarification. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 512-519.

11.

Dohrenwend, B. (1990). “The problem of validity in field studies of psychological disorders” revisited. Psychological Medicine. 20, 195-208.

12.

Graham, J. R. (1993). MMPI-2: Assessing personality and psychopathology (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

13.

Hyler, S. E., Skodol, A. E., Oldham, J. M., Kellman, H. D., et al. (1992). Validity of the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-Revised: A replication in an outpatient sample. Comprehensive Psychiatry. 33. 73-77

14.

Hong, S., & Cho, Y. (1999). Latent structure of the Social Interaction Self-Statement Test: An application of hierarchical confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Reports, 84, 1303-1314.

15.

Horowitz, L. M., Rosenberg, S. E., Baer, B. A., Ureño, G., & Villaseñor, V. A. (1988). Inventory of Interpersonal Problems: Psychometric properties and clinical applications. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 885-892.

16.

Kim, Y., Pilkonis, P. A., & Barkham, M. (1997). Confirmatory factor analysis of the personality disorder subscales from the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems. Journal of Personality Assessment, 69, 284-296.

17.

Morey, L. C., Waugh, M. H., & Blashfield. R. K. (1985). MMPI scales for DSM-Ⅲ personality disorders: Their derivation and correlates. Journal of Personality assessment, 49, 245-256

18.

Pilkonis, P. A., Kim, Y., Proietti, J. M., & Barkham, M. (1996). Scales for personality disorders developed from the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems. Journal of Personality Disorders, 10, 355-369.

19.

Scarpa, A., Luscher, K. A., Kadee, J., Smalley, M. S., Pilkonis, P. A., Kim, Y., & Williams, W. C. (1999). Screening for personality disorders in a nonclinical population. Journal of Personality Disorders, 13, 345-360

20.

Steiger, J. H., & Lind, J. M. (1980). Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, IA.

21.

Stone, M. H. (1990). The fate of borderline patients. New York: Guilford.

logo