E-ISSN : 2733-4538
This study aimed to identify the assessment value of projective drawing tests in determining probability of child sexual abuse. To accomplish this, we compared Van Hutton's quantitative drawing scores(preoccu- pation with sexually relevant concepts: SRC, aggression and hostility: AH, withdrawal and guarded accessibility: WGA, alertness for danger, suspiciousness, and lack of trust: ADST) in a single sexual abuse group (n=31), a multiple sexual abuse group (n=33), an alleged sexual abuse with no evidence group (n=30), and a clinical group with no history of sexual abuse (n=64). Results indicated that, there were no group differences in SRC, AH, and ADST. However, the clinical group had significantly higher scores than the others with respect to WGA. Drawings of genitals, breasts, or anuses were not observed in any group. The implications of the findings and limitations of the current study as well as recommendations for future study have been discussed.
김태경, 이영호 (2010). 성폭력 피해 아동의 진술양상. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 29, 301- 325.
김태경 (2010). 아동성폭력 피해가능성 평가기준 개발 및 타당화 연구. 가톨릭대학교 박사학위청구논문.
김태경, 최지영, 윤소미, 신의진 (2006). 성폭력 피해 아동의 로샤반응 특성: 로샤검사가 성폭력 피해의 증거를 제공해줄 수 있는가? 한국심리학회지: 임상, 25, 766-780.
주간동아 (2010. 5, 17). 네 살, 여섯 살 자매 성병 균 검출 사건. http://weekly.donga.com/ docs/magazine/weekly/2010/05/17/201005170500023/201005170500023_2.html.에서 2010. 5. 20에서 인출
Adams, J. A. (2004). In training, medical evaluation of suspected child sexual abuse. Journal Pediatric Adolescent Gynecology, 17, 191-197.
Arenella, J. & Ornduff, S. R. (2000). Manifestations of bodily concern in sexually abused girls. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 64, 530-542.
Babiker, G., & Herbert, M. (1998). The role of psychological instruments in the assessment of child sexual abuse. Child Abuse Review, 5, 239-251.
American Psychology Association (2005). Specialty Guidelines for Forensic Psychology.
Faller, K. C. (2007). Interviewing children about sexual abuse: controversies and best practice. NY: Oxford University Press.
Hibbard, R. A., Roghman, K., & Hoekelman, R. A. (1980). Genitalia in children's drawings: An association with sexual abuse. Pediatrics, 79, 129-137.
Hutton, V. (1994). House-Tree-Person and Draw- a-Person as measures of abuse in children: A quantitative scoring system. Odessa. FL: Pscyological Assessment Resources.
Ngernyam, N (2005). A study of abuse in children by House-Tress-Person and Draw-a-Person: A quantitative scoring system. Mahidol University. http://mulinet10.li.mahidol.ac.th/e-thesis/4436499.pdf에서 인출
Palmer, L., Farrar, A. R., Ghahary, N., Panella, M., & DeGraw, D. (2000). An investigation of the clinical use of the House-Tree-Person projective drawings in the psychological evaluation of child sexual abuse. Child Maltreatment, 5, 169-175.
Peterson, L. W., & Hardin, M. E. (1997). Children in distress: A system for screening children's art. NY:Norton.
Piperno, F., Biasi, S. D., & Levi, G. (2007). Evaluation of family drawings of physically and sexually abused children. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 16, 389-397.
Shapse, S. N. (2007). When a test is not a test: Tests without forensic validity. http://www. shapse.com/Articles/ Tests%20 without%20 Forensic%20Validity.pdf에서 인출
Vass, Z. (1998). The inner formal structure of the H-T-P drawings: An exploratory study. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 54, 611-619.
Veltman, M., & Browne, K. (2002). The assessment of drawing from children who have been maltreated: A systematic review. Child Abuse Review, 11, 19-37.
Verdun, M. (1987). Comparison of human figure drawings of sexually abused children, physically abused children, and children who have been both sexually and physically abused with drawings of clinical and normal controls. Dissertation Abstracts International, 49, 4-B.(UMI No. 890601)
Waterman, J. & Lusk, R. (1993). Psychological testing in evaluation of child sexual abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 17, 145-159.
Yates, A., Beutler, L. E., & Crago, M. (1985). Drawings by child victims of incest. Child Abuse and Neglect, 9, 183-189.