바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Construction and Validation of the Korean Version of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Short Form (K-PID-5-SF)

Abstract

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5 (DSM-5) Section III includes a hybrid dimensional-categorical model of personality disorders. The Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 (PID-5) was developed with 220 items to assess the personality traits within this model but has several limitations such as fatigue and difficulty in maintaining attention. The im of this study was to develop and validate the Korean version of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Short Form (K-PID- 5-SF). Through confirmatory factor analysis, it was found that K-PID-5-SF had similar factor structures to those of the Korean version of PID-5. The internal consistency of the K-PID-5-SF was adequate. The K-PID-5-SF had significant correlations with the Korean version of PID-5, Korean Personality Disorders Test, the Personality Psychopathology Five, and the NEO-Five Factor Inventory. In conclusion, the K-PID-5-SF had adequate reliability and validity for evaluating personality pathology, contributing to a better understanding of an alternative DSM-5 model for personality disorders.

keywords
성격, 성격장애, DSM-5 Section III, DSM-5 성격질문지 단축형, K-PID-5-SF, personality, personality disorder, DSM-5 section III, the personality inventory for DSM-5 short form, K-PID-5-SF

Reference

1.

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington., DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.

2.

Anderson, J. L., Sellbom, M., Ayearst, L., Quilty, L. C., Chmielewski, M., & Bagby, R. M. (2015). Associations between DSM-5 section III personality traits and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory 2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) scales in a psychiatric patient sample. Psychological Assessment, 27, 801-815.

3.

Chmielewski, M., Bagby, R. M., Markon, K., Ring, A. J., & Ryder, A. G. (2014). Openness to experience, intellect, schizotypal personality disorder, and psychoticism: Resolving the controversy. Journal of Personality Disorders, 28, 483-499.

4.

Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4, 5-13.

5.

De Fruyt, F., De Clercq, B., De Bolle, M., Wille, B., Markon, K., & Krueger, R. F. (2013). General and maladaptive traits in a fivefactor framework for DSM-5 in a university student sample. Assessment, 20, 295-307.

6.

Edwards, P., Roberts, I., Sandercock, P., & Frost, C. (2004). Followup by mail in clinical trials: Does questionnaire length matter?. Controlled Clinical Trials, 25, 31-52.

7.

Few, L. R., Miller, J. D., Rothbaum, A. O., Meller, S., Maples, J., Terry, D. P., & MacKillop, J. (2013). Examination of the section III DSM-5 diagnostic system for personality disorders in an outpatient clinical sample. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122, 1057-1069.

8.

Fossati, A., Krueger, R. F., Markon, K. E., Borroni, S., & Maffei, C.(2013). Reliability and validity of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) predicting DSM-IV personality disorders and psychopathy in community-dwelling Italian adults. Assessment, 20, 689-708.

9.

Gore, W. L., & Widiger, T. A. (2013). The DSM-5 dimensional trait model and five-factor models of general personality. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122, 816-821.

10.

Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor Analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

11.

Harkness A. R., McNulty J. L., Ben-Porath Y. S. (1995). The personality psychopathology five (PSY-5): Constructs and MMPI-2 scales. Psychological Assessment, 7, 104-114.

12.

Hong, S. H. (2000). The criteria for selecting appropriate fit indices in structural equation modeling and their rationales. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 19, 161-177.

13.

Hong, T. H., Hwang, S. T., & Kim, Y. L. (2018). Replication study of the Korean version Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (K-PID-5). Manuscript in preparation.

14.

Jepson, C., Asch, D. A., Hershey, J. C., & Ubel, P. A. (2005). In a mailed physician survey, questionnaire length had a threshold effect on response rate. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 58, 103-105.

15.

Kim, J. H., Kim, B. H., & Ha, M. S. (2011). Validation of a Korean version of the Big Five Inventory. Journal of Human Understanding and Counseling, 32, 47-65.

16.

Krueger, R. F., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., & Skodol, A. E. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Medicine, 42, 1879-1980.

17.

Lee, K. I. (1995). Factor structure and maladaptive group profiles of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory for Korean (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Pusan Natoinal University, Busan, Korea.

18.

Maples, J. L., Carter, N. T., Few, L. R., Crego, C., Gore, W. L., Samuel, D. B., & Krueger, R. F. (2015). Testing whether the DSM-5 personality disorder trait model can be measured with a reduced set of items: An item response theory investigation of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Assessment, 27, 1195-1210. https://doi.org/10.15842/kjcp.2018.37.3.010 407

19.

Quilty, L. C., Ayearst, L., Chmielewski, M., Pollock, B. G., & Bagby, R. M. (2013). The psychometric properties of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 in an APA DSM-5 field trial sample. Assessment, 3, 362-369.

20.

Seo, J. S., & Hwang, S. T. (2006). Development and validation of the Korean Personality Disorders Test. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 25, 273-288.

21.

Shin, S. Y., & Hwang, S. T. (2016). Reliability and validity of the Korean version Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5). Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 30, 1-24.

22.

Skodol, A. E., Bender, D. S., Morey, L. C., Clark, L. A., Oldham, J. M., Alarcon, R. D., & Siever, L. J. (2011). Personality disorder types proposed for DSM-5. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 136-169.

23.

Suzuki, T., Samuel, D. B., Pahlen, S., & Krueger, R. F. (2015). DSM-5 alternative personality disorder model traits as maladaptive extreme variants of the five-factor model: An item-response theory analysis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 124, 343-354.

24.

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.

25.

Thomas, K. M., Yalch, M. M., Krueger, R. F., Wright, A. G., Markon, K. E., & Hopwood, C. J. (2012). The convergent structure of DSM-5 personality trait facets and five-factor model trait domains. Assessment, 3, 308-311.

26.

Watson, D., Stasik, S. M., Ro, E., & Clark, L. A. (2013). Integrating normal and pathological personality: Relating the DSM-5 traitdimensional model to general traits of personality. Assessment, 3, 312-326.

27.

Widiger, T. A., & Simonsen, E. (2005). Alternative dimensional models of personality disorder: Finding a common ground. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19, 110-130.

28.

Yam, W. H., & Simms, L. J. (2014). Comparing criterion-and traitbased personality disorder diagnoses in DSM-5. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 123, 802-808.

logo