바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of the Informant-Report Form of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (K-PID-5-IRF)

Abstract

This study set out to translate into Korean the Informant-Report Form of Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5-IRF), which was developed to measure the DSM-5 Personality Trait Model comprised of five domains and 25 facets, and test the reliability and validity of the Korean version. For these purposes, the items of PID-5-IRF in English were translated into Korean through the process of translation and reverse translation and organized the entire items so that they would have consistent meanings with the items of the Korean version of the Self-Report Form of PID-5 (K-PID-5-SRF). K-PID-5-IRF (n=230) and K-PID-5-SRF & the Korean Personality Disorders Test (n=176) were conducted to college students and ordinary citizens aged 18 or older. The analysis results show that K-PID-5-IRF recorded a high level of internal consistency in domains and facets. Its factor structure properly matched overall that of PID-5-IRF in English and that of the DSM-5 Personality Trait Model despite number of factors and differences in three facets between them. Concordance between K-PID-5-SRF and KPID- 5-IRF was a little bit lower than that of their English counterparts, but it had statistically significant correlations and was in a proper level founded in researches on correlations between the informant-report form and the self-report form on personality. Finally, domains and facets of K-PID-5-IRF had a relatively appropriate match with the core personality traits of each personality disorder. These findings imply that K-PID-5-IRF is a tool to assess the personality traits of grown-ups in a reliably and valid manner.

keywords
personality disorder, DSM-5, DSM-5 section III, personality inventory for DSM-5, K-PID-5, K-PID-5-IRF, informant report, 성격장애, DSM-5, DSM-5 Section III, DSM-5 성격질문지, K-PID-5, K-PID-5-IRF, 정보제공자보고형

Reference

1.

American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorder (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

2.

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorder (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

3.

Asendorpf, J. B., & Ostendorf, F. (1998). Is self-enhancement healthy? Conceptual, psychometric, and empirical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 955-966.

4.

Bergman, A. J., Nyland, J. E., & Burns. L. R. (2007). Correlates with perfectionism and the utility of a dual process model. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 389-399.

5.

Bernieri, F. J., Zuckerman, M., Koestner, R., & Rosenthal, R. (1994). Measuring person perception accuracy: Another look at selfother agreement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 367-378.

6.

Biesanz, J. C., & West, S. G. (2004). Towards understanding assessments of the Big Five: Multitrait-multimethod analyses of convergent and discriminant validity across measurement occasion and type of observer. Journal of Personality, 72, 845-876.

7.

Biesanz, J. C., West, S. G., & Millevoi, A. (2007). What do you learn about someone over time? The relationship between length of acquaintance and consensus and self-other agreement in judgments of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 119-135.

8.

Broday, S. F. (1988). Perfectionism and millon basic personality patterns. Psychological Reports, 63, 791-794.

9.

Carlson, E. N. (2013). Honestly arrogant or simply misunderstood? Narcissists’ awareness of their narcissism. Self and Identity, 12, 259-277.

10.

Carlson, E. N., Vazire, S., & Oltmanns, T. F. (2013). Self-other knowledge asymmetries in personality pathology. Journal of Personality, 81, 155-170.

11.

Chmielewski, M., & Watson, D. (2008). The heterogeneous structure of schizotypal personality disorder: Item-level factors of the schizotypal personality questionnaire and their associations with obsessive-compulsive disorder symptoms, dissociative tendencies, and normal personality. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117, 364-376.

12.

Cho, E. S. (2007). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis: Journal of Korean Marketing Association 1986-2006. Journal of Korean Marketing Association, 22, 179-208.

13.

Cho, S. H., Lee, S. J., & Kim, J. O. (2008). Comparison of malingering related characteristics between pre-trial forensic offenders determined as normal and other diagnoses: Based on MMPI-2profiles. Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 22, 45-58.

14.

Clifton, A., Turkheimer, E., & Oltmanns, T. F. (2005). Self- and peer perspectives on pathological personality traits and interpersonal problems. Psychological Assessment, 17, 123-131.

15.

Colvin, C. R., & Funder, D. C. (1991). Predicting personality and behavior: A boundary on the acquaintanceship effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 884-894.

16.

Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

17.

Connelly, B. S., & Ones, D. S. (2010). An other perspective in personality:Meta-analytic integration of observers’ accuracy and predictive validity. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 1092-1122.

18.

Connolly, J. J., Kavanagh, E. J., & Viswesvaran, C. (2007). The convergent validity between self and observer ratings of personality:A meta-analytic review. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15, 110-117.

19.

Coolidge, F. L., Burns, E. M., & Mooney, J. A. (1995). Reliability of observer ratings in the assessment of personality disorders: A preliminary study. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51, 22-28.

20.

Duckworth, A. L., & Kern, M. L. (2011). A meta-analysis of the convergent validity of self-control measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 259-268.

21.

Dunkley, D. M., Blankstein, K. R., Halsall, J., Williams, M., & Winkworth, G. (2000). The relation between perfectionism and distress: Hassles, coping, and perceived social support as mediators and moderators. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47, 437-453.

22.

Egan, S. J., Wade, T. D., & Shafran, R. (2011). Perfectionism as a transdiagnostic process: A clinical review. Clinical Psychology Review, 31, 203-212.

23.

Enns, M. W., & Cox, B. J. (1999). Perfectionism and depression symptom severity in major depressive disorder. Behavior Research and Therapy, 37, 783-794.

24.

Flett, G. L., Hewitt, P. L., & Dyck, D. G. (1989). Self-oriented perfectionism, neuroticism and anxiety. Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 731-735.

25.

Frost, R. O., Marten, P., Lahart, C., & Rosenblate, R. (1990). The dimensions of perfectionism. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 14, 449-468.

26.

Funder, D. C., & Colvin, C. R. (1988). Friends and strangers: Acquaintanceship, agreement, and the accuracy of personality judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 149-158.

27.

Funder, D. C., Kolar, D. C., & Blackman, M. C. (1995). Agreement among judges of personality: Interpersonal relations, similarity, and acquaintanceship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 656-672.

28.

Grove, W. M., & Tellegen, A. (1991). Problems in the classification of personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorder, 5, 31-41.

29.

Hayes, A. F., & Dunning, D. (1997). Construal processes and trait ambiguity: Implications for self-peer agreement in personality judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 664-677.

30.

Hewitt, P. L., & Flett, G. L. (1991). Perfectionism in the self and social context: Conceptualization, assessment and association with psychopathology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 456-470.

31.

Hirschfeld, R. M. (1993). Personality disorders: Definition and diagnosis. Journal of Personality Disorders (Suppl. 1), 9-17.

32.

Hogan, R. (1998). Reinventing personality. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 17, 1-10.

33.

Hwang, S. T., Yoon, H., & Lee, S. H. (2008). The relationships between DSM-IV personality disorders and the five factors of personality. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 27, 777-789.

34.

Jang, J. Y., & Hwang, S. T. (2012). The relationships of between personality and marital satisfaction in married couples. Korean Journal of Woman Psychology, 17, 133-148.

35.

Jin, H. Y., Kwon, E. J., Kwon, J. E., & Hwang, S. T. (2010). Comparison of self- and peer perceptions of interpersonal problems according to personality disorders. Journal of Human Understanding and Counseling, 31, 211-230.

36.

Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31-36.

37.

Klein, D. N. (2003). Patients’ versus informants’ reports of personality disorders in predicting 7 1/2-year outcome in outpatients with depressive disorders. Psychological Assessment, 15, 216-222.

38.

Klonsky, E. D., Oltmanns, T. F., & Turkheimer, E. (2002). Informantreports of personality disorders: Relation to self-reports and future research directions. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9, 300-311.

39.

Krueger, R. F., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., & Skodol, A. E. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait mode and inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Medicine, 42, 1879-1890.

40.

Lee, S. M. (2000). Basis of factor analysis. Seoul, Korea: Kyoyookbook.

41.

Luo, S., & Snider, A. G. (2009). Accuracy and biases in newlyweds’perceptions of each other: Not mutually exclusive but mutually beneficial. Psychological Science, 20, 1332-1339.

42.

Malloy, T. E., Albright, L., Kenny, D. A., Agatstein, F., & Winquist, L. (1997). Interpersonal perception and meta-perception in nonoverlapping social groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 390-398.

43.

Markon, K. E., Quilty, L. C., Bagby, R. M., & Krueger, R. F. (2013). The development and psychometric properties of an informantreport form of the personality inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5). Assessment, 20, 370-383.

44.

McGrath, R. E., Mitchell, M., Kim, B. H., & Hough, L. (2010). Evidence for response bias as a source of error variance in applied assessment. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 450-470.

45.

Naragon-Gainey, K., & Watson, D. (2011). Clarifying the dispositional basis of social anxiety: A hierarchical perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 926-934.

46.

Oh, I. S., Wang, G., & Mount, M. K. (2011). Validity of observer rating of the five-factor model of personality traits: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 762-773.

47.

Olino, T. M., & Klein, D. N. (2015). Psychometric comparison of self- and informant-reports of personality. Assessment, 22, 655-664.

48.

Oltmanns, T. F., Gleason, M. E. J., Klonsky, E. D., & Turkheimer, E. (2005). Meta-perception for pathological personality traits: Do we know when other think that we are difficult? Consciousness and Cognition, 14, 739-751.

49.

Oltmanns, T. F., & Turkheimer, E. (2009). Person perception and personality pathology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 32-36.

50.

Paulhus, D. L., & Bruce, M. N. (1992). The effect of acquaintanceship on the validity of personality impressions: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 816-824.

51.

Paunonen, S. V. (1989). Consensus in personality judgments: Moderating effects of target-rater acquaintanceship and behavior observability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 823-833.

52.

Rushton, J. P., Brainerd, C. J., & Pressley, M. (1983). Behavioral development and construct validity: The principle of aggregation. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 18-38.

53.

Samuel, D. B., & Widiger, T. A. (2008). A meta-analytic review of the relationships between the five-factor model and DSM-IV-TR personality disorders: A facet level analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 1326-1342.

54.

Saulsman, L. M., & Page, A. C. (2004). The five-factor model and personality disorder empirical literature: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1055-1085.

55.

Seo, J. S., & Hwang, S. T. (2006). Development and validation of the Korean Personality Disorders Test. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 25, 273-288.

56.

Seong, T. J., & Si, K. J. (2014). Research Methodology. Seoul, Korea:Hakjisa.

57.

Shin, S. Y., & Hwang, S. T. (2016). Reliability and validity of the Korean version Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5). Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 30, 1-24.

58.

Stevens, J. P. (1992). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

59.

Swann, W. B. Jr. (1997). The trouble with change: Self-verification and allegiance to the self. Psychological Science, 8, 177-180.

60.

Tucker, L. R., & MacCallum, R. C. (1997). Exploratory factor analysis. Unpublished manuscript, Ohio State University, Columbus.

61.

Vazire, S. (2006). Informant reports: A cheap, fast, and easy method for personality assessment. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 472-481.

62.

Vazire, S. (2010). Who knows what about a person? The self–other knowledge asymmetry (SOKA) model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 281-300.

63.

Vazire, S., & Carlson, E. N. (2010). Self-knowledge of personality:Do people know themselves? Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 605-620.

64.

Vazire, S., & Carlson, E. N. (2011). Other sometimes know us better than we know ourselves. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 104-108.

65.

Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1991). Self- versus peer ratings of specific emotional traits: Evidence of convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 927-940.

66.

Watson, D., Hubbard, B., & Wiese, D. (2000). Self-other agreement in personality and affectivity: The role of acquaintanceship, trait visibility, and assumed similarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 546-558.

67.

Westen, D. (1997). Divergences between clinical and research methods for assessing personality disorders: Implications for research and the evolution of Axis II. American Journal of Psychiatry, 154, 895-903.

68.

Westen, D., & Heim, A. K. (2003). Disturbances of self and identity in personality disorders. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 643-666). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

69.

Whang, S. M., & Lee, R. H. (2010). Personality as types of self perception of others’ evaluation: How Koreans perceive personality. Journal of Korean Society for the Scientific Study of Subjectivity, 20, 121-143.

logo