바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

The Relationships between Zhongyong, Mental Health, and Psychological Flexibility

Abstract

In this study, the relationships between the practical Confucian virtue of Zhongyong (Doctrine of the Mean), mental health, and psychological flexibility were investigated. Zhongyong consists of three aspects: understanding the situations and taking appropriate action or optimal response (timeliness and harmony); not being biased and going toward the extreme (dynamic balance and equilibrium); and being open to and tolerant of others (empathy). This study was designed to examine the relationships between the Zhongyong attitude and various positive/negative psychological variables (depression, anxiety, borderline personality traits, self-esteem, well-being, psychological flexibility, and interpersonal competence) with the participation of 364 college students. The results indicated that Zhongyong was significantly correlated with lower levels of depression, anxiety, and borderline personality traits and higher levels of self-esteem, well-being, and interpersonal competence. In particular, the Zhongyong attitude had a stronger effect on interpersonal competence than psychological flexibility. Finally, the implications and limitations of this study and suggestions for future research are discussed.

keywords
중용, 심리적 건강, 심리적 유연성, 대인관계, Zhongyong, mental health, psychological flexibility, interpersonal relationships

Reference

1.

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder-5th edition (DSM-5). Washington, DC: Author.

2.

An, D. Y., & Lee, H. J. (2016). Psychological construct of Zhongyong (Doctrine of the Mean): A preliminary study. Korean Journal of Psychology: General, 35, 283-300.

3.

An, D. Y., & Lee, H. J. (2017). Development and validation of the Zhongyong Questionnaire. Korean Journal of Psychology: General, 36, 421-440.

4.

An, D. Y., & Lee, H. J. (2018). Relationship between Zhongyong and emotion regulation. Unpublished raw data.

5.

An, D. Y., & Lee, H. J. (2019). Development and effects of the Zhongyong Attitude Cultivating Program. Korean Journal of Psychology:General, 38, 127-163.

6.

Bae, S. W., & Shin, W. S. (2005). The factor structure of the CES-D Scale (The Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale):An application of confirmatory factor analysis. Health and Social Science, 18, 165-190.

7.

Beck, A. T., Brown, G. K., Steer, R. A., Kuyken, W., & Grisham, J. (2001). Psychometric propersites of the Beck Self-esteem scales. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 39, 115-124.

8.

Bond, F., Hayes, C., Baer, R., Carpenter, K., Guenole, N., Orcutt, H., . . . Zettle, R. (2011). Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II: A revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance. Behavior Therapy, 42, 676-688.

9.

Buhrmester, D., Furman, W., Wittenberg, M. T., & Reis, H. T. (1998). Five domains of interpersonal competence in peer relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 991-1008.

10.

Chiu, C. (2000). Assessment of Zhong-yong (dialectic) thinking:Preliminary findings from a cross-regional study. Hong Kong Journal of Social Sciences, 18, 33-55.

11.

Cho, Y. (2007) Assessing emotion dysregulation: Psychometric properties of the Korean version of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 26, 1015-1038.

12.

Choi, H. J. (2018). Evidence for Dialectical Behavior Therapy and dissemination in Korea: A systematic review. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 37, 443-463.

13.

Chon, K. K., Choi, S. C., & Yang, B. C. (2001). Integrated adaptation of CES-D in Korea. Korean Journal of Health Psychology, 6, 59-76.

14.

Chou, L., Chu, C., Yeh, H., & Chen, J. (2014). Work stress and employee well-being: The critical role of Zhong-Yong. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 115-127.

15.

Endler, N. S., & Kocovski, N. L. (2001). State and trait anxiety revisited. Anxiety Disorders, 15, 231-245.

16.

Gallup Korea. (2015). The religion of Koreans 1984-2014. Seoul:Gallup Korea.

17.

Glenn, C. R., & Klonsky, E. D. (2009). Emotion dysregulation as a core feature of borderline personality disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders, 23, 20-28.

18.

Gould, E. R., Tarbox, J., & Coyne, L. (2018). Evaluating the effects of acceptance and commitment training on the overt behavior of parents of children with autism. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 7, 81-88.

19.

Han, N. R., & Lee, D. G. (2010). Validation of the Korean version of the Interpersonal Competence Questionnaire in Korean college students. Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 22, 137-156.

20.

Hahn, D. W., Lee, C. H., & Tak, J. K. (1993). A study for the standardization of the Spielberger state-trait anxiety inventory. Journal of Student Guidance, 10, 214-222.

21.

Hayes, S. (2002). Buddhism and acceptance and commitment therapy. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 9, 58-66.

22.

Hayes, S. (2004). Acceptance and commitment therapy, relational frame theory, and the third wave of behavioral and cognitive therapies. Behavior Therapy, 35, 639-665.

23.

Hayes, S., Luoma, J., Bond, F., Masuda, A., & Lillis, J. (2006). Acceptance and commitment therapy: Model, processes and outcomes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44, 1-25.

24.

Heo, J. H., Choi, M. S., & Jin, H. J. (2009). Study on the reliability and validity of Korean Translated Acceptance-Action Questionnaire-II. Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 21, 861-878.

25.

Hong, S. H., & Kim, Y. H. (1998). A validation study of the borderline personality disorder scale in Korean university students. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 17, 259-271.

26.

Huang, C. L., Lin, Y. C., & Yang, C. F. (2012). Revision of the ZhongYong Belief-Value Scale. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 38, 3-41.

27.

Jankowski, T., & Holas, P. (2014). Metacognitive model of mindfulness. Consciousness and Cognition, 28, 64-80.

28.

Kashdan, T., & Rottenberg, J. (2010). Psychological flexibility as a fundamental aspect of health. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 865-878.

29.

Kernberg, O. (2008). Borderline conditions and pathological narcissism (Yoon, S.Y., Trans). Seoul, Korea: Hakjisa. (Original work published 1975. NY: Jason Aronson, Inc.).

30.

Keyes, C. L. M. (2003). Complete mental health: An agenda for the 21st century. In C. L. M. Keyes, & J. Haidt (Eds.), Flourishing:Positive Psychology and the Life Well-Lived (pp. 293-312). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.

31.

Keyes, C. L. M., Wissing, M., Potgieter, J., Temane, M., Kruger, A., & van Rooy, S. (2008). Evaluation of the mental health continuum-short form (MHC-SF) in Setswana-speaking South Africans. Clinical Psychology and Psyhotherapy, 15, 181-192.

32.

Kolubinski, D. C., Marino, C., Nikčević, A. V., & Spada, M. M. (2019). A metacognitive model of self-esteem. Journal of Affective Disorders, 256, 42-53.

33.

Kim, H. E., & Park, K. (2014). The effects of process variables in acceptance commitment therapy for women’s depression. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 33, 429-458.

34.

Kim, J. T. (1978). A study based on the standardization of the STAI for Korea. The New Medical Journal, 21, 69-75.

35.

Kim, S. J. (2018). Relation between depression/anxiety and emotion regulation choice: Role of affective flexibility. Clinical Psychology in Korea: Research and Practice, 4, 211-237.

36.

Kim, Y. Y. (2011). Zhong Yong: Nature, dao, and education. Seoul:Tongnamu.

37.

Lee, E. K., & Song, M. K. (2018). Effectiveness of ACT-based group counseling for depression and anxiety: A meta-analysis. The Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 30, 635-661.

38.

Lee, H. J., & Won, H. T. (1995). An exploratory study of the relationship between paranoid tendency, self-concept and self-consciousness. Paper presented at the 95’ Annual Conference of the Korean Psychological Association, Seoul.

39.

Lee, J., Kwak, H. W., Lee, S., & Chang, M. S. (2013). Emotion regulation in young adults with borderline personality traits: Focusing on inhibitory functions for emotional stimuli, emotional hyper-reactivity, and emotional dysregulation. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 32, 543-565.

40.

Lee, J. Y., & Kwon, S. M. (2009). The relationship between emotion disorders and emotion regulation strategies. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28, 245-261.

41.

Lee, S. A., & Kwon, S. M. (2017). Self regulation and psychological disorders: A review of the empirical literature. Korean Journal of Psychology: General, 36, 1-37.

42.

Lee, S. W. (1997). A Psychological Approach of Zhongyong. Paper presented at the 97’ Annual Conference of the Korean Psychological Association, Seoul.

43.

Lim, Y. J., Ko, Y. G., Shin, H. C., & Cho, Y. R. (2012). Psychometric Evaluation of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHCSF)in South Koreans. Korean Journal of Psychology: General, 31, 369-386.

44.

Min, B. B. (2015). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)Workshop. Seoul: Maumsarang Institute for Cognitive and Behavioral Therapies.

45.

Ministry of Gender Equality and Family. (2011). 2010 Family Survey. Retrieved from http://www.mogef.go.kr/mp/pcd/mp_pcd_s001d.do?mid=plc503.

46.

Muto, T., Hayes, S., & Jeffcoat, T. (2011). The effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy bibliotherapy for enhancing the psychological health of Japanese college students living abroad. Behavior Therapy, 42, 323-335.

47.

Pan, W., & Sun, L. (2018). A self-regulation model of Zhong Yong thinking and employee adaptive performance. Management and Organization Review, 14, 135-159.

48.

Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Arndt, J., & Schimmel, J. (2004). Why do people need self-esteem? A theoretical and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin, 13, 435-468.

49.

Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385-401.

50.

Rahim, M. A. (1983). A Measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 368-376.

51.

Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

52.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials:A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Reviews Psychology, 52, 141-166.

53.

Shapiro, S. L., Carlson, L. E., Astin, J. A., & Freedman, B. (2006). Mechanisms of mindfulness. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62, 373-386.

54.

Shin, A. Y., & Chae, J. H. (2011). Emotion regulation strategies in patients with depressive and anxiety disorders. Cognitive Behavior Therapy in Korea, 11, 41-52.

55.

Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., & Lushene, R. E. (1970). STAI manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. Palo Alto, California:Consulting Psychologists Press.

56.

Statistics Korea. (2016). 2005, 2015 Population and Housing Census. http://kosis.kr/statisticsList/statisticsListIndex.do?menuId=M_01_01&vwcd=MT_ZTITLE&parmTabId=M_01_01.

57.

Sun, X., Yan, M., & Chu, X. (2014). Passive mood and work behavior:The cross-level mediating effect of Zhong-Yong. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 46, 1704-1718.

58.

Twohig, M., Vilardaga, J., Levin, M., & Hayes, S. (2015). Changes in psychological flexibility during acceptance and commitment therapy for obsessive compulsive disorder. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 4, 196-202.

59.

Tyndall, I., Waldeck, D., Pancani, L., Whelan, R., Roche, B., & Dawson, D. L. (2019). The Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II) as a measure of experiential avoidance: Concerns over discriminant validity. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 12, 278-284.

60.

Van Orden, K. A., Witte, T. K., Gordon, K. H., Bender, T. W., & Joiner Jr., T. E. (2008). Suicidal desire and the capability for suicide:Tests of the interpersonal-psychological theory of suicidal behavior among adults. Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, 76, 72-83.

61.

Wang, P., & Yu, Y. (2014). A Review of the Relationship on Zhongyong Thinking and Innovation Intention. 2nd International Conference on Advances in Social Science, Humanities, and Management.

62.

Wolgast, M. (2014). What does the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ-II) really measure?. Behavior Therapy, 45, 831-839.

63.

World Health Organization. (2014). Mental health: a state of wellbeing. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/features/factfiles/mental_health/en/.

64.

Wu, C., & Lin, Y. (2005). Development of a Zhong-yong thinking style scale. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 12, 247-299.

65.

Yang, X., Zhang, P., Zhao, J., Zhao, J., Wang, J., Chen, Y., . . . Zhang, X. (2016). Confucian culture still matters: The benefits of Zhongyong Thinking (Doctrine of the Mean) for mental health. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47, 1097-1113.

66.

Yao, X., Yang, Q., Dong, N., & Wang, L. (2010). Moderating effect of Zhong Yong on the relationship between creativity and innovation behavior. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 53-57.

logo